Skipping the QDRO to "save on fees"?
Combining and equalizing accounts assumes a dollar in one account equals a dollar in the other. One of you pays for that assumption.
It comes up in almost every mediation: "We each have a retirement account — let's skip the QDROs, keep our own accounts, and just award a piece of one account to even things up." It sounds efficient. Here's what that agreement actually says, mathematically: one dollar of investments in my account equals one dollar of investments in yours. That's almost never true — and the error lands on one of you.
A worked example
At separation, Wife's account is worth $50,000 and Husband's is worth $100,000. To "save on fees," they skip dividing both accounts and instead award Wife 25% of Husband's account — figuring everyone lands equal at $75,000.
A year passes before the division is processed. Wife's account earns 10% (now $55,000). Husband's earns 20% (now $120,000). Wife receives her promised 25% — $30,000.
Final score: Wife $85,000, Husband $90,000. If both accounts had simply been divided by standard QDRO, each party would hold $87,500. Wife saved roughly $375 in fees and lost $2,500 in appreciation; Husband saved $375 and collected a $2,500 windfall.
The bigger the accounts, the bigger the error
A standard QDRO divides not just the balances as of separation but the proportional gains and losses that follow them — automatically, whatever the market does. An offset locks in a guess. The larger the accounts, and the more the investments differ between them, the larger the error factor grows. And nobody knows in advance which spouse the error will favor.
Two more offset traps: taxes and "same value" accounts
Equalizing a pre-tax 401(k) against an after-tax asset like a vehicle or home equity silently compares a taxed dollar to an untaxed one — the equalization should be adjusted for the tax character of each asset (Roth accounts being the exception). And two 401(k)s "worth the same" at separation are only the same if they're invested the same: an index-fund account and a single-company-stock account can diverge violently before the division is processed. When possible, divide retirement assets in kind, and save equalization for smaller accounts where a market swing can't produce a grossly inequitable result.
Obviously we're biased — we're QDRO attorneys. That doesn't make the math wrong. If you're considering an offset or equalization, have someone run both scenarios before you sign. Sometimes an offset genuinely fits a global settlement; it should be a choice made with numbers, not a shortcut made to save a filing fee.
Considering an offset in your settlement?
We can run the division both ways — standard QDRO versus offset — so you make the call with real numbers instead of hope.
Your initial phone conference is free. California (951) 523-7376 · Texas (817) 864-8385.